This week's thoughts . . .

One of the things that has been most interesting to me is how people react to the news of us leaving the church, but more specifically, how people who were never members react.

Growing up, I was often told that my non-member friends, acquaintances, teachers, and co-workers would all know of my religious standards, and would be watching me carefully. I kinda always pictured it as a cross between Roz from Monsters, Inc. and James Tolkan's character from Top Gun.

"I'm watching you, Wazowski. Always watching. And if you screw up just this much, you'll be flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog [crap] out of Hong Kong!"

In fact, most of the world was this way, because the church was known so well worldwide with all of its charitable works and humanitarian aid efforts. I got the impression that everyone recognized that what I (and other church members) was doing was the best/correct way of living, but these other people weren't strong enough to do the same.This was presented as an example of the "crab mentality," in the sense that everyone else (the "world") was waiting to pull me down if I stooped to their level, so I had to constantly stay above them and out of their reach. I was, of course, encouraged to try to convert them to bring them up to my standards.

For what it's worth, I fully recognize that this was my own interpretation of what I was told/taught at home and church and not official doctrine, but many other ex-Mormons have expressed similar sentiments, so I'm not alone.

The other thing I was always taught was that the temple was this place where things so spectacular and holy took place that we weren't able to speak of them outside of its walls. Non-members were just dying to get in there and find out what happens in there and learn the secrets. People often tried to sneak in to the temple, but the older gentlemen who guarded the doors kept them out through the spirit of discernment. And besides the temple stuff, there were plenty of other things that people wanted to know about the church but they were too afraid to ask.

I figured that once we announced we had left the church, non-member friends would be banging down our doors to find out the big secrets they had so longed to know. Additionally, this was such a life-changing event that they must be curious to know every juicy detail.

As it turns out, most people are generally uninterested. After I had removed the Mormon rose colored glasses, I learned that many people have a hard time distinguishing Mormons from Jehovah's Witnesses and even the Amish (including inside the US - especially in the eastern parts). Most people might equate an event like resigning from the church to something like switching gym memberships, while in our mind it's more like coming out of the closet and announcing one's self to be gay.

And they don't really care about the temple - they just think it to be weird and laughably cultish. People are not obsessed with seeing if their Mormon friends drink caffeinated Coke, or drop the F-bomb. They don't think twice about what goes on in the temple any more than you probably think about Shaolin monks learning Kung Fu.

I guess it's one of the hallmarks of an organization like this to make its members self-important and artificially inflate its influence. It's one of those things that makes me seriously face-palm when I think about it. But I'm just glad I'm out and can now see what everyone else can see without the blindfold of mind-control. 

Expecting Too Much

I recently had an experience where I was talking with someone about my reasons for leaving the church. The first thing that was asked about was if someone had offended me or something like that. I told him no, I wouldn’t let something petty like that get in the way of my eternal salvation, and proceeded to explain a few of my (legitimate) reasons. After I listed a few things and how I felt about them, he told me that I must not have been a very strong member to let those things bother me, and that I expected too much of the leaders of the church (read: held them to too high of a standard). But then he didn’t want to go any further into the conversation. Since I didn’t really get to respond to him, I’ll do so on this blog just to get my thoughts off my chest, even if it’s never read by him.This is the response to the “expected too much” jab. The other half was a previous post.


I am told that I became disillusioned when I learned that prophets were not perfect. I never expected perfection. On the contrary, believing that prophets were weak and mortal but called to a great work anyway was inspiring. It’s not their private behavior that is troubling (that’s what repentance was supposedly for). It’s their prophetic work, official statements, policies, published writing, and public teachings that are the problem. It's the fact that they don't really do what they say they're supposed to do. It's really summed up in a General Conference meme I saw last year made by a faithful member. It showed a wide shot of the Conference Center and the caption read, "Come see a Prophet, Seer, and Revelator." But the kicker was what someone else added to it. At the bottom was another caption that read, "literally do none of those things."

Maybe it's because I was taught from birth how cool it was that we had an actual prophet - someone who talks with Jesus and God regularly passing on the info we need. I mean, we read about cool prophets and apostles in the scriptures, like Moses, Elijah, Peter, Paul, Nephi, and Alma. And then we're told in countless lessons that in SLC, less than a 6 hour drive away from where I was raised, was today's equivalent. Other talks had stories of non-members observing that if we didn't know what the prophet had to say this month, then we must not really consider him a prophet worth following (the underlying message was: "Renew your Ensign subscription"). But I don't expect perfect prophet. But here what I do expect:

• I do expect prophets to avoid a century of making racist statements, official policies, and doctrine.

• I do expect prophets to not marry young girls or other men’s wives.

• I do expect prophets to not lie about polygamy.

• I do expect a prophet to be ahead of his time (not behind it) in racial, gender, sexual issues. Either get ahead of the issues or stick to your position because aligning with social norms a decade or two late, just looks very…non-prophetic.

• I do expect a prophet to not go on national television and say that we don’t teach things that are at the very heart of our doctrine.

• I do expect a prophet to know when they are being conned (Kinderhook Plates, the Mark Hofmann forgeries, etc) since we teach how BoM prophets are able to confound opponents and know their thoughts like Ammon did. 

• I do expect a prophet to give a full accounting of the billions and billions in revenues and expenditures to his followers

• I do expect a prophet to perform miracles. Why were the two Christian doctors with ebola flown straight to Atlanta and not Salt Lake? I know, I know, I'm being unreasonable here. That would be to close to expecting a perfect prophet. Retracted.

• I do expect a prophet to prophesy.
  
• I do expect a prophet to not lie when asked a direct question, and then hem and haw about it when he realizes that he has been caught. 

• I expect a prophet to discern between speaking as a man and speaking for God. If he can't tell, what good is he? It's like a compass that works 50% of the time. You're not blessed for following it.

• I do expect a prophet to see and talk with God and Jesus and not change who was or wasn't there each time the story is told.

• If I sustain a prophet, seer and revelator, I expect more than just day-to-day administration of a corporation.

• If I sustain an individual as President or representative of an organization, I expect them to speak for that organization - NOT hide behind a PR Newsroom.

In short, I expect a prophet to be like the ones in the scriptures, if they really are prophets. Of course, what I think now is that the deeds of past prophets are probably more akin to the feats of Hercules in the recent movie starring Dwayne Johnson - basically exaggerated oral tales.

But now we are told to, "Give Brother Joseph" a break (something I'm sure they intend to for us to extend to any one of the 'brothern' that make up the top 15, past and present). Like I said, I'm fine with people not being perfect. But if it's okay in God's eyes for a prophet to screw something up now and again and accidentally have incorrect doctrine/policies, why did he abandon the Catholic church if he's fine with all of these things? Why did they need a restoration? If, despite a clear line back to the early Christian church, proper authority through laying on of hands needed to be restored, why not just have Peter, James, and John give it to the Pope and instantly have a billion people in his true church? I don't feel the need to answer these questions myself as an agnostic, but I doubt any Mormon apologist has a good answer for this.

And I am always dumbfounded by the defense True Believing Mormons make of apostles that they are just "products of their time," or they, "grew up in a different culture," while the "prophets" are constantly telling us to not be influenced by the trends of our day. But it's somehow ok that they are apparently steeped in the trends of THEIR day. I thought the whole reason why we needed a prophet was to rise above popular sentiment and show us truth. How come none of them realized that American racism was a bad thing? How about a teaching or two about the advancement of women (not the advice to wear lipstick)?

To use a sports analogy, it gets tiring putting on a front to the world about how the Chicago Cubs are the perpetually the greatest perennial undefeated World Series team when reality says something far different. Sometimes you gotta call a spade a spade and realize that these are just businessmen running a corporation, not inspired leaders of a church who talk with Jesus. It's funny how obvious it is once you let yourself see it and think about it without all the brainwashing that comes with it, kinda like "the Cheerleader Effect" from How I Met Your Mother (apologies on the helium voices in the clip - it's not mine). Once the illusion is broken, you can't get it back. Kinda like believing in Santa. 

Lastly, the church often uses the phrase, "By their fruits ye shall know them," usually referring to knowing if someone is of Christ or of the Devil by seeing what kind of acts they do. I believe that applies in this situation, as well. From what I can see, their fruits are similar to those I would expect of a corporate head, and not the fruits of a prophet (i.e., prophecies, translations, etc.). 

My "Church Pedigree"

I recently had an experience where I was talking with someone about my reasons for leaving the church. The first thing that was asked about was if someone had offended me or something like that. I told him no, I wouldn’t let something petty like that get in the way of my eternal salvation, and proceeded to explain a few of my (legitimate) reasons.

After I listed a few things and how I felt about them, he told me that I must not have been a very strong member to let those things bother me, and that I expected too much of the leaders of the church (read: held them to too high of a standard). But then he didn’t want to go any further into the conversation. Since I didn’t really get to respond to him, I’ll do so on this blog just to get my thoughts off my chest, even if it’s never read by him.

This is the response to the “wasn’t a very strong member” jab. The other half will be another post.

One accusation often flung at people who leave the church is something along the lines that they didn’t really believe, or weren’t really faithful (often accompanied by the ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy). Or that they were lazy, or just possibly wanted to sin. It’s really condescending, as there are many legitimate reasons to leave an organization.

But just to put it out there, here is my “church pedigree,” presented as a checklist with a longer explanation afterwards.

√  Born in the Covenant

√  Baptized at age 8

√  Ordained to Aaronic Priesthood at age 12

√  Promoted to office of Teacher at age 14

√  Promoted to office of Priest at age 16

√  Received Patriarchal Blessing at age 16

√  Received Eagle Scout Award at age 17

√  Graduated Seminary with near perfect attendance

√  Ordained to Melchizedek Priesthood at age 18

√  Attended Ricks College for a year

√  Received Endowment in Boise Temple at age 18

√  Served a faithful mission in Japan

√  Married in Timpanogos Temple at age 22

√  Paid tithing in full from 9^th grade on, and kept a current
        Temple Recommend until about a year before we left the church

□  Graduated Institute

□  Always did my Home Teaching

I was BIC, or ‘born in the covenant,’ meaning that my parents had been sealed together in the temple before I was born. I come from pioneer stock on my mom’s side (William Clayton, if you must know), and all my extended family were members of the church. We had FHE most weeks, and started reading scriptures almost every night as a family. I was baptized at 8 years old, and received the Aaronic priesthood at age 12. During my stint as a deacon, I showed up on time and passed the sacrament without complaint, and served as the quorum’s secretary.

I think it was also during this time that one Sunday we had a substitute Deacons Quorum teacher (J Sher) who had forgotten he had agreed to teach. He told us all to pile into his car and he drove us to Albertson’s. When he pulled into the parking lot, he instructed us to stay in the car. About 5 minutes later he came out with some kind of ice cream bars and passed them out to us. My cousin Jason happened to be visiting that day, and he thought it was great, and asked if this was what we did every week. I refused to eat the ice cream, as I knew it had been purchased on the Sabbath day.

At age 14, I moved into the Teacher’s quorum, where I was usually the first boy to start preparing the sacrament each week (though the credit for that can be mostly given to my dad, who went to church a little early to secure his favorite parking spot and bench). But there were many weeks where I was the only one who had prepared the sacrament except for the last 2 or 3 minutes. I didn’t complain, but wondered what would happen if I didn’t show up early.

When I started Seminary, I missed a few days during my freshman year because I had stayed home sick. But I’m pretty sure I only missed maybe 1 other day during the entire next three years. This was made possible by the A/B rollover schedule we switched to, and I usually had my math, seminary, and my other favorite classes on the same day. The result was that I only missed the other days.

As a priest, I think I blessed the sacrament probably all but maybe 15 weeks during those 2 years (and those were usually vacation or sick days). I received my Patriarchal Blessing, and was asked to be the seminary class president, and then during my senior year to be on the Seminary Council. I also baptized my younger brother because my dad wasn’t being the most active member at the time.

I read the Book of Mormon on my own (in addition to scripture study with my family) and reported to the bishop on my progress. I also took it upon myself to go online and defend the church in chat rooms, to better know what I would be against while on my mission.

After graduating Seminary and high school, I went to RicksCollege (in the 2^nd to last year it was Ricks), and continued my streak of church attendance. The only day I missed was the night I got locked out of my room (long story) and I had to sleep in the laundry room (because it was the only warm place).

I spent most of my visits home from school in some sort of mission prep function, like getting my wisdom teeth out, going through the temple, or attending interviews. By the time I left for the MTC, I had read the Book of Mormon probably 5 times as a family, and twice on my own. While in the MTC, I was disheartened at how little most of the other missionaries knew about basic gospel principles, or even the contents of the Book of Mormon.

I served a mission to Japan, a country not known for its hoards of converts, while learning a language with a reputation for being difficult. After 9 months in the field I became a trainer, and a few months later a District Leader. I moved up to Zone Leader for 4 months before going home. I followed the mission rules strictly, and other than the days I had a sick companion, we were out doing some kind of missionary work every day (except for the one time my companion and I saw Star Wars. C’mon, it’s Star Wars). The one time I broke the Word of Wisdom also happened there, when I accidentally got half a mouthful of green tea by mistake. Other than that, the only WoW infractions I incurred were eating fruit out of season or eating meat when there was no famine (nor did I use tobacco to heal bruised cattle).

When I got home, I moved to Utah and was married in the temple within the year. After around 2 and a half years of living in the new ward, I was asked to be the Elders Quorum President. I declined, as we had a newborn and I was working fulltime and attending night school fulltime. I also had experienced the beginnings of my faith crisis, and felt that the ward deserved someone who fully believed. The ward had a major division between those established in homes and those in apartments. The apartment dwellers were usually snubbed when it came to callings of any significance, so it was kind of a big deal to me. I accepted the calling of Sunday School President until we moved. After being in our new ward about a year, I was asked to be the 1^st Counselor in the EQP. I accepted because the President was my friend who had also served a mission in Japan, and whom I had a lot in common. I did that for 3 years before being asked to move up to President again, which I again declined.

And one more thing to add - I knew the Book of Mormon so well that Anne and I used to play this game where she would pick a random verse and start reading, then I would tell her book and chapter (I only got stumped twice).

About the only 2 dings on my record are that my home teaching dedication wasn’t always the best, and I didn’t go to institute (unless you count the year at Ricks).

It wasn’t until 6 years in “Scouter Darkness” that we ended up leaving the church, during which I paid tithing in full and did everything else I needed to do to keep a current Temple Recommend.


And during that time was when I was working through my faith crisis, desperately trying to find ways to do mental gymnastics to make things work and find ways to keep believing despite my nagging doubts that kept refusing to stay tucked away on “the shelf” of issues in my mind.

So, if I may be so bold, don’t you DARE accuse me of being a lukewarm member! I did EVERYTHING I was supposed to. It wasn't because I was a weak-willed member who was, "seduced by the Dark Side of the Force," after reading "anti-Mormon" lies. It was learning about all the true facts about church history that were hidden from me, and confirming them from church-approved websites that did it. The fact that they came out and admitted to a lot of these things only confirms my decision.

Edit/Update: I don't want it to sound like I think I'm perfect. I was far from it, making my share of mistakes including not always treating my brothers nicely (like the usual brotherly teasing). But on the things that might be considered on "the checklist," I took care of it. 

Long But a Good Read

I really enjoyed this blog post. It is long but a very good read and explains a lot of my feelings and thoughts as well.

 http://www.linkingarms.org/2015/10/21/authentically-healthier-and-happier-in-most-ways/

An Amazing Poet

He summed it up so well.

The just several sentences short of 14 Articles of Faith

This was too good not to repost. User stratiform from Reddit made these (not me), but I have altered them slightly with suggestions from the comment thread about them and added links to relevant material.


·         1. We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His wives who are nameless and numberless, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost . . . . or at least we do after the 1837 edition of the Book of Mormon was published.

·         2. We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression, but there was a time where we believed men would be punished for Cain's sins. He was pretty bad, so all his descendants were black. Many of our infallible prophets preached this, but they were wrong. But women are still totally going to be punished for Eve's transgression. 5 Nov 2015 UPDATE: Also, if your parents are gay, you're outta luck too. 

·         3. We believe that through faith in Joseph Smith, the current prophet and Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of our slightly modified version of Joseph's Gospel.

·         4. We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in the current prophet and his apostles; second, Repentance by confession to your middle-aged male neighbor; third, Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; fourth, Laying on of hands for everything; fifth, temple rituals in which you dedicate your life and possessions to the church; sixth, having your immortal calling and election made by mortals, if you are well connected.

·         5. We believe that a prophet is determined by gathering a group of well connected Mormons with good bloodlines, and by observing who outlives the others of the group, he will then preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof. This is deemed correct by God and it is His way.

·         6. We believe in a pretty unique organization not seen in the Primitive Church, namely, prophets by succession, apostles, seventies, stake presidents, bishops, and so forth. We do agree with primitive churches that women cannot become any of these.

·         7. We literally believe that Joseph Smith placed a rock into a hat and God made words glow upon them. He would then repeat these aloud and this is how the Book of Mormon was written. We call it a translation. We also believe "translation" can mean when one uses a historical document for inspiration in writing about the cosmos and various ordinances.

·         8. We believe the Bible and Book of Mormon to be the words of God as far as they are translated correctly; we also believe listening to what our prophets and apostles require of us is more important than either of these.

·         9. We believe all that God revealed a sword bearing angel to Joseph Smith. The angel commanded Joseph Smith that he must wed little girls and other men's wives, and that he should keep it secret from his legal wife, Emma.

·         10. We believe in the literal gathering of Israel and in the restoration of the Ten Tribes; that Zion (the New Jerusalem) will be built upon the American continent in Jackson County, Missouri, the same place Adam and Eve existed; that Christ and his prophets will reign personally upon the earth; and, that the earth will be renewed and receive its paradisaical glory.

·         11. We claim to be followers of Christ, but in reality we follow the Almighty President Newsroom which dictates our own conscience and political stances, and request all Mormons take the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what we tell them to.

·         12. We believe in being subject to the current prophet and his apostles. Kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates are known for their wicked desires of us to obey, honor, and sustain their laws, but we will only obey them as far as legally required of us. We do not honor or sustain them unless they go along with our religious beliefs.


·         13. We believe in being deceptive, misleading, chaste, complete dicks to former members, subjectively virtuous, and publishing apologetic essays; indeed, we may say that we follow the admonition of Brigham—We believe ridiculous things, many of us hope things end soon, for we have endured many things that we bring upon ourselves, and hope to be able to endure more of these things. If there is a down and out person desperate for friendship or potential exposure to good media, we seek after these things.

Thoughts on Marriage

In light of the SCOTUS’s decision to allow gay marriage across the whole country, I keep hearing two complaints from conscientious objectors: 1) Religious freedom is under attack, and 2) Freedom of Speech is under attack. 


Part the First

For the first part, I’m going to use a post from Facebook reposted on Reddit through Imgur because it states what I think perfectly and beautifully. Unfortunately, I don’t have a name to give the credit to for the original text. I have made a few slight corrections for grammar and clarification, and put his/her words in Yellow to differentiate from my own. 

Religious liberties in this country are not at risk. Today was not a blow against religious freedom, but rather a mighty blow for it. Bear with me: you are allowed to eat pork, despite the presence of Jews and Muslims in this country. You are allowed to drink alcohol despite the presence of Mormons and Muslims in this country. You can eat beef despite the presence of Hindus, and buy birth control despite the presence of Catholics. You can drive a car despite the Amish. You can smoke, eat meat, curse, divorce, have sex, remain abstinent, dance, put cheese on your hamburger and work on the Sabbath. All of these are at odds with someone's religion. Religious freedom is not only my freedom to practice my faith but your freedom to not. Religious freedom is your freedom from my religion, I from yours, and us from our neighbors. As a matter of religious freedom my religion is no more valid than yours, nor yours mine. As a matter of religion most everyone will believe their own the most valid. 

Many moralities are generally accepted as universal, regardless of religion: things like murder or stealing is bad, and children are the future. Many moralities are dictated by culture and religion (like swearing or drawing pictures of Mohammed), and we must, as a free society and a decent people examine these with an eye towards different cultures and religions. 

You may ask, "What about public officials giving marriage licenses to marriages against their religion?" My opinion is that they can deal with it (as far as I am aware the ruling does not address this). That is part of taking a job that serves the public indiscriminately. EMTs are still required to treat the drunk driver, with just as much care as their victims. Judges must abide by the decision of the jury even when they know an innocent man is convicted, or a guilty man going free. Public officials of any sort may be put in uncomfortable positions, and they still must perform their duties. It a sacrifice that is made for the greater good. 

As for religions and clergy the ruling specifies they neither have to condone nor recognize same sex marriages. This is as it should be. A religion has the right to define marriage for the purpose of religion. The Supreme Court ruling changes nothing in the eyes of whatever God someone believes in. But as long as marriage is also a legal institution with various legal benefits it cannot be made available to only a select group from that standpoint. The ruling not only specifically protects the right of religion organizations to define marriage as they see fit, but to preach and proselytize that view. It encourages that discourse, and recognizes its importance in this issue. The ruling minces no words in very strongly invoking the First Amendment’s protection of religious liberty.

Lastly, this doesn’t cheapen marriage or the family. The fact that people of all walks of life, and all cultures want to partake in marriage and family only speaks to its value and importance to the human condition. My love of mushroom pizza doesn’t discount your enjoyment of pineapple pizza; it just shows the variety that is possible. What marriage and family means has continuously evolved all through human history, and across cultures. This trend likely doesn’t stop now, and will likely never stop. Look at the myriad types of marriages across cultures today, or through history, even in religious texts. 

Today is a victory for religious liberty, for family, for justice, and for all who want to live in an equal and free society. 



Just to add my own thoughts, the government won’t (and I don’t think they legally can) force someone to perform a marriage against their will, but it’s the Justice of the Peace’s job to do so.  As a 7-11 employee, I was required to sell cigarettes and alcohol even though I was Mormon at the time, and had the freedom to seek employment elsewhere if selling such things was "against my religion."

And just to add to the bit about different types of marriages, this image shows the 8 different kinds of marriage found in the Bible, some of which you may find repugnant. And as a special note to the LDS church, I find the push for monogamy between one man and one woman ironic. Officially, Monogamy is policy that can be found in the Church Handbook of Instructions, while Polygamy is still doctrine, as found in D&C 132. 


Part the Second


For the second part, I’ll be tackling the “attack on Freedom of Speech” myself. 

Freedom of speech isn’t being attacked. The freedom refers to not being arrested/imprisoned for saying something. You are free to make fun of the president and the government officials without fear of imprisonment. If this were not so, late night Talk shows would be very, very different (watch V for Vendetta for what it’s like to have this liberty revoked). 

Because of freedom of speech, you are allowed to speak your mind and post on Facebook whether you are for or against Gay marriage (or any other law/bill/ruling). I am free to voice my disdain for the TPP without fear. 

But that means that other people are also free to disagree with you, and (even though it’s probably not nicest reaction) to call you names if your opinions differ. If we change it to some other issue, such as whether the earth is flat or round, you will probably see what I mean. 

To my complete bafflement, there still exists today a group of people who insist the earth is flat, aptly named the Flat Earth society. They are free to believe what they want despite the absolute mountains of evidence against their position. They are free to post their opinions on Facebook, and free to attempt to persuade you to see their point of view. 

But we are also free to disagree with them, and to call them idiots for not understanding the science behind why we know (and can prove beyond all doubt) the earth to be roughly spherical. I’m sure they see themselves as being persecuted because their opinion doesn’t fall in line with the general public’s opinion, and feel they constantly have to defend their position against naysayers. 

But nothing in the Constitution protects them from being thought of badly by the rest of us. 

Wanting the freedom to express an unpopular opinion and being shielded from public scorn is a classic case of eating your cake and having it. Think if you had expressed the opinion that slaves should be allowed to be freed and even hold public office in the year 1800. You would have a rather unpopular opinion, and the public wouldn’t agree with you or like you for it.

If you held the reverse opinion today (that African Americans shouldn’t hold public office), you will be called a racist among other unpleasant epithets. But, again, you would be allowed to have such an opinion and no government pressure would or should dissuade you. You just may not be liked by a lot of people, and your business or friendship may be boycotted. And all the while why you hold this (hypothetical) opinion, African Americans will be allowed to hold public office despite your thoughts because the general public has decided that equality should be the rule of the land. 

As a final thought, you should watch X-Men, X2, X-Men: First Class and X-Men: Days of Future Past. Not only are they good movies, but if you substitute "homosexual" for "mutant," you will get a good idea of my position. 


(written by Joseph)

Today's Thoughts

When we decided to leave the LDS faith a little over 2 years ago, we lost a lot. We lost our sense of religion and had to come to terms with what we now believe, and we lost a lot of our community/friends. We were also accused of looking at "anti-Mormon" sites, joining a polygamous group, and much more. Our former stake president held a special meeting about apostasy for our former ward where we were mentioned by name and he warned everyone to stay away from the internet when looking for answers about the church. But over the past year and few months the LDS church has published a series of essays on their site dealing with some of these issues. The following link will take you to the church’s website: https://www.lds.org/topics?lang=eng. Most of the "difficult issues" essays are displayed on the right for convenience.

I know that many struggle when they come across these facts and aren't sure what to do. Some choose to stay and some choose to leave like us. Either way it is my hope that we don’t judge one another for the choices we each make, and that everyone can find peace for themselves.

Joseph and I now run the Ogden Post-Mos ex-mormon group. If you are struggling with your faith, need to make new friends, or just need to vent, we are here and willing to help in any way we can. We understand that losing the church is like losing a loved one and that it takes time to heal. We have met many who struggle to tell family and friends because they know that they will lose many. Leaving the Mormon faith wasn't easy for us; it was the most difficult thing I have ever done. I still mourn for it at times because I miss knowing exactly how the afterlife is supposed to work, having ward parties and gatherings, and I miss chatting with friends in the hall at church. 

Anyhow those are just a few of my thoughts today. This post was inspired by this video by Brother Jake.