Monday, January 20, 2014

The definition of "cult"

It can be argued that by one definition, any religion could technically be called a cult. But since that gets us nowhere, let’s look at some another definition from Webster:

: a small religious group that is not part of a larger and more accepted religion and that has beliefs regarded by many people as extreme or dangerous

The problem with the qualification of “accepted” and “large” is that at some point, all major world religions were small and unaccepted. To the Romans and Jews of the 1st century, Christianity was a small, upstart cult. But now because of the billions of adherents (in some form or another) it is accepted as a legitimate religion. The reason I don’t like this is that it relies on the “might makes right” principle, or strength in numbers (known as Agumentum ad populum).

Another definition that I found that probably adds to the definition to make it clearer:

A group that uses manipulative psychological “mind control” techniques to recruit and control their members. These techniques might be “love bombing”, instant friends or emotional blackmail. At extremes it might include keeping people away from their friends and family and isolating them both physically and emotionally.

Sometimes we hear the terms “mind control” and “brainwashing” used interchangeably, but there are a few differences. Mainly, brainwashing is done coercively by someone perceived as an enemy using threats of personal and familial safety. The victim experiences “thought reform” as a survival mechanism. Kidnapping victims like Elizabeth Smart and Jaycee Dugard experienced this, commonly called Stockholm Syndrome.

Meanwhile, “mind control” is a little different. It is more subtle, and done by people who are considered to be trusted friends. Sometimes the people doing it don’t even realize that they are doing it. The process is slower and seen as a positive thing.

Mind control techniques can be summed up with something called the BITE model, created by Steven Alan Hassan. It stands for: Behavior control, Information control, Thought control, Emotional control.

With Behavior control, they:

Say what clothes to wear: clothing that covers garments
Say how many piercings and tattoos are appropriate
Say what to eat and drink: Word of Wisdom
Regulate time: between 3 hours of church, FHE, Mutual, callings, Temple Trips, Elders Quorum/Relief Society activities, firesides, and other meetings, the average LDS person probably spends upwards of 20 hours a week doing church activities.
Demand perfection and/or obedience: This quote from Marion G Romney, taken from General Conference in October 1960: “Standing by me, [Heber J. Grant] put his arm over my shoulder and said: ‘My boy, you always keep your eye on the president of the church and if he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you do it, the Lord will bless you for it.’ Then with a twinkle in his eye, he said, ‘But you don't need to worry. The Lord will never let his mouthpiece lead the people astray.’”
Have bizarre rituals/ordinances: Temple ordinances, though some of the bizarreness was dropped in 1990, and still others later in 2005.
Have a financial obligation: Tithing
Want members to have a dependence on group

With Information control, they:

Deliberately withhold information: Until last month, the LDS Church never admitted to Joseph Smith using a rock put into his hat to "translate" the Book of Mormon, and instead promoted the idea that it was translated directly from the plates.
Minimize or discourage access to non-church sources of information: Telling members to not look at “anti-mormon” literature, or only trust internet searches from lds.org.
Whitewashing history or disturbing facts: Quote from Boyd K. Packer: There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not. Some things that are true are not very useful. (from “The Mantle is Far, Far Greater than the Intellect”)
Encourage spying on other members: Home Teaching and Visiting Teaching. In the LDS church, this is probably more benign than in other groups. But it is stated that the bishop is able to keep tabs on the needs of the ward through HT/VT, but also to know if everyone is reading scriptures, praying, etc.
Extensive use of church-generated information and propaganda: The Ensign/New Era/Friend, Church News, books from Deseret Book.
Distort information to make it more acceptable: Usually called “milk before meat,” or “line upon line.” It’s like signing a contract without knowing all the details because if you knew all the details you’d run.
Downplay the past leaders’ mishaps (Joseph Smith’s polygamy/polyandry, the fact that he had a gun and killed 2 people before he was shot, destroying a printing press that was accusing him of polygamy)
Insist that any information that casts a negative light on the church is taken out of context or that it is an outright lie.

With Thought control, they:

Require members to internalize the group’s doctrine as truth, instill black and white thinking, and an “us vs. them” or “insiders vs. outsiders” mentality.
Use loaded language and clichés which constrict knowledge and stop critical thoughts: Anytime they are confronted, LDS members are told to bear testimony or sing a hymn.
Instilling the idea that they are the only ones who have the truth, a.k.a. the “one and only true church”
Teaching thought-stopping techniques which shut down reality testing by stopping negative thoughts and allowing only positive thoughts: “Contention is of the devil.” This shuts down debates that might lead to the member thinking about an outsider’s point of view.
Forbid critical questions about leader, doctrine, or policy. Doubts are turned around on the member and their devotion or worthiness to the group is questioned.
Tell members to go to leaders for answers to questions, not outside sources.

With Emotional control, they:

They use guilt and fear heavily to make one afraid to question or leave the group. They will also use the threat of losing one’s family: The LDS church promotes the idea of a “forever family,” but only if everyone is a faithful member.
They teach that good feelings are from god, and that they are the ultimate source of truth.
Phobia indoctrination, including inculcating irrational fears about leaving the group or questioning the leader’s authority. No happiness or fulfillment possible outside of the group and terrible consequences if you leave. Here's an example of this kind of phobia indoctrination from David Bednar.
Shunning of those who leave; fear of being rejected by friends, peers, and family
Teach that those who leave were offended, or couldn’t live the standards, and that there’s no legitimate reason to leave the organization. The organization often uses character assassinations on those who left so as to discredit any information they might spread around.
Ritualistic and sometimes public confession of sins: Bishops’ interviews of teenagers where they ask about masturbation and other “sins” of a sexual nature to instill guilt into them.
Love-bombing: When someone is about to join or starting to waver in their devotion, the members rally around the person to shower them with social interaction, kindness, gifts of food, notes that they are missed, etc.
The double-bind: They ask prospective members to read/pray and see if they get the good feeling. If they don’t, they tell the person that they must be doing something wrong. There is only one “correct” answer.

The BITE model mentions several other things that don’t apply to the LDS church, but most of them do. (visit the above link for the full list)

My personal thought is that it is probably the most mainstream cult in existence, and that it straddles the line dividing church from cult. They display many of the attributes, but none to the severe outward extent that we often think of cults having. Reprisals aren't so overt as threats to life and limb as with many Muslim groups, or threats of lawsuit to recover money as with Scientology, or overt shunning as with Jehovah’s Witnesses. It's still very real though. Shunning can still happen by devout family members, but the church disavows an official policy. They in fact state that they do the opposite but it seldom works that way in reality. Mormons are subtly trained from infancy to use sort of a passive-aggressive approach to disciplining each other, sort of a stealth disapproval if someone gets out of line. It's part of the "worthiness fetish." They are a purity cult.

It's certainly not a destructive/dangerous cult like the Branch Dividians or an Islamic jihadist group. They are a Christian denomination, and they do some good in the community. But they most definitely exhibit a lot of the traits that cults have.

(written by Joseph)

Sunday, January 19, 2014

The Judgments of Family and Friends

When we left the LDS faith we heard about a few of the rumors that went around about us because people from our former ward would come and ask us if they were true. The biggest and most bizarre one was that we had joined another sect of Mormonism and have become polygamists. This is not true. We have not joined with any religious groups.
In addition to these rumors, we have experienced many judgments and some shunning from our LDS family and friends.  Most of Joseph’s family has not said much about it and treats us like nothing has changed at least when we are around, but who knows what they might say when we aren’t there to hear it.  However, Joseph had one brother that made a lot of judgments in the beginning and did not treat us very Christ-like but when this was pointed out he more or less stopped.  This same brother of Joseph also deleted me as a friend on Facebook.  
I should mention that other Facebook friends of the Mormon faith have also deleted me from Facebook because they feel like I post negative things. For them I say: What about all the LDS things that get posted on my wall? You could always choose to hide what you don’t like. That is what I do.
My family has been okay for the most part with the exception of 2 family members who make judgments almost every time I talk with them. For example, tonight I joked about how we should bet on something we were debating about and they immediately assumed that I must be a gambler, now that I have left the church. The other family member of mine likes to ask me if I have started drinking/smoking amongst other things.  
I just don’t get why so many LDS people feel they have the right to judge others. They are not God. I know cigarettes are not healthy for me. I watched my grandfather die from smoking and may experience the same thing with my dad. I am not planning on smoking. But I have always felt that alcohol was okay, even when I was a TBM (true believing Mormon). I don’t think that because one drinks a single drink of alcohol that it makes them an alcoholic. I believe it is the behavior in which they do it. Do they abuse it? So I may try it because I am curious. I may even gamble for fun if I am in Vegas but I won’t make it a hobby.
I just want people to know that Joseph and I would never have left the church if it were true (the one and only). We are not dumb people. We didn’t leave over something small and stupid, like being offended by someone. We left because we found out about several things that the church has in their history that did not sit right with us. We could not be part of a cult that continues to lie to their people.

Fortunately, there have been a couple of families who have not shunned us. One is a family who moved far away a couple of years ago and decided to email us when they heard of the news. Her husband struggled at one point with the church but decided to stay because he likes the values the church teaches and felt it was the best place to raise their children. The second family also moved from our former ward, but only a short distance away and still remains friends with us. It is nice to know that there are still a few good people out there that don’t think they are God.  

Saturday, January 4, 2014

The first "Rock" star of Mormonism

In case you hadn't heard, the LDS church is in the middle of releasing a series of “essays” that are meant to help members who have questions about some of the “difficult” topics concerning doctrine and history. They've already covered the multiple versions of the “First Vision” story, the Priesthood ban on those of African descent, and polygamy.

The most recent one concerns how Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon. What is depicted in the church’s art usually involved Joseph Smith looking at a set of golden plates with Oliver Cowdery acting as a scribe.  Here are a bunch of examples:






One thing to note is that with only one exception, none of them show him using the “Nephite Interpreters,” commonly known as the Urim & Thummim, and most do not show a curtain separating Joseph and Oliver.

But after years of denying it, the church finally admits that it was translated by use of a seer stone in Joseph Smith’s hat. These pictures are probably more accurate:



What’s interesting about these is that one of them came from the show South Park. They had a better description of the translation process than the LDS church did!

Here are some supporting statements from LDS church history corroborating this:

Emma Smith (Joseph's first wife):
"In writing for your father I frequently wrote day after day, often sitting at the table close by him, he sitting with his face buried in his hat, with the stone in it, and dictating hour after hour with nothing between us."
   -   The Saints Herald, Vol. 26, No. 19, p.289


David Whitmer (one of the Three Witnesses of the Book of Mormon):

"I will now give you a description of the manner in which the Book of Mormon was translated. Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man."

To be fair, Apostle Russell Nelson did use that quote in an Ensign article in July of 1993. But until now, that statement had only been in print once during my entire life. It does seem like the church wasn't too keen on being forthright about this.


Here are statements from past General Authorities about the “seer stone” method of translation:


 Joseph Fielding Smith, 10th president of the church:
While the statement has been made by some writers that the Prophet JS used a seerstone part of the time in his translating of the record, and information points to the fact that he did have in his possession such a stone, yet there is no authentic statement in the history of the church which states that the use of such a stone was made in that translation. The information is all hearsay, and personally, I do not believe that the stone was used for this purpose.
...
It hardly seems reasonable to suppose that the prophet would substitute something evidently inferior [to the Urim & Thummim] under these circumstances. It may have been so, but it is so easy for a story of this kind to be circulated due to the fact that the prophet did possess a seerstone, which he may have used for some other purposes.
    - Doctrines of Salvation vol.3 pg 225-226


Apostle Bruce R. McConkie: 
"In imitation of the true order of heaven where seers receive revelation from God through the Urim & Thummim, the devil gives revelations to some of his followers through peepstones or crystal balls."
    - in his book Mormon Doctrine under peepstones

Improvement Era Article:
"In the opinion of the writer, the Prophet used no seer stone in translating the Book of Mormon, neither did he translate in the manner described by David Whitmer and Martin Harris. The statements of both of these men are to be explained by the eagerness of old age to call upon a fading and uncertain memory for the details of events which still remained real and objective to them."
Improvement Era, October, 1939


Apostle John A. Widtsoe: 
"Some use was made also of the seer stone and occasional mention was made of it. This was a stone found while the Prophet assisted in digging a well for Clark Chase. By divine power this stone was made serviceable to Joseph Smith in the early part of his ministry. There is no evidence that this stone was used in Joseph's sacred work"
   -  Joseph Smith—Seeker After Truth, 1951, p. 267


And here’s the best part: they still have the stone in the Church’s vaults.

Joseph Fielding Smith, the tenth President of the LDS church: 
"The statement has been made that the Urim and Thummim was on the altar in the Manti Temple when that building was dedicated. The Urim and Thummim so spoken of, however, was the seer stone which was in the possession of the Prophet Joseph Smith in early days. This seer stone is now in the possession of the church."
        -  (Doctrines of Salvation,Vol. 3, p. 225)

Why wouldn’t they want to parade this out and show people? Because it seems weird, hokey, and makes it look more like “folk magic” rather than divine inspiration. Add to that the fact that Joseph wasn’t even looking at plates at all, and it makes one wonder why it was so important that they were preserved! And if they still have this miraculous stone, why haven't any of the subsequent prophets, seers, and revelators used it to translate?

More information: http://mormonthink.com/transbomweb.htm#introduction

(Written by Joseph)