It's been a minute, actually years, since I have felt the need to to post. I've moved on, healed for the most part, and rarely think about church. But this weekend I received an email from the "Mormon Church" letting me know that my personal info may have been comprised by a hacker. We verified that the email was legit and that many other ex-Mormons who have had their names removed also received the same email. In the past members have asked, "Why can't you just leave the church alone?" I ask the same thing, "Why can't the church leave me alone?"
Why? Why do they even have my information in their system. I, along with Joseph and our kids had our records removed years ago. We have zero intention of ever returning. Our kids have actually thanked us for getting them out young and for allowing them to think for themselves. Why can't the "Mormon Church" respect that and delete us from their system and shred any all documents that have our information. (Disclaimer: I get that they aren't required to do so by US law)
The email mentioned that they "immediately" reported this incident to Law Enforcement. Interesting, considering the clergy in the church aren't encouraged to report various forms of abuse to Law Enforcement. Our daughter is currently writing a paper in her English 2010 class about clergy penitent privilege and it took a lot of digging for her to get scholarly info on the subject, so I do know that the "Mormon Church" is capable of hiding information and deleting information.
If the church wants my respect then they need to respect me and my choice to leave. Until then, I will continue to have zero respect for the "Mormon Church". It took some time, but thankfully we have been able to reach mutual respect with our immediate families and some friends.
Life After Mormonism
A New Perspective
Wednesday, October 19, 2022
Zero Respect for the Mormon Church
Monday, June 27, 2016
Marvel vs. Mormon
I saw this post on Imgur comparing Star Wars and Game of Thrones and was inspired to create my own version of it, comparing Mormon myths to (mainly) Marvel heroes.
I guess my point (besides trying to make someone laugh) is to reiterate one of Jeremy Runnell's points during his Mormon Stories interview with John Dehlin. To wit, "Everything is a remix." This was his response to the question of how he thought the Book of Mormon came about - that Joseph Smith just kinda took the Bible, added a few original bits, wrote in some of the sermons he had heard from local preachers, threw in some military strategy from another book he read, pretend to dictate it from reading his i-stone in his hat, and BOOM! You get the Book of Mormon.
Another thing that motivated me to make these images was the movie Hercules starring Dwayne Johnson. In it, there's a group of people who help a strong man do some stuff and the details are greatly (and purposely) exaggerated as they are told and retold. That's pretty much what I think of most Bible stories and the supernatural or miraculous events it presents as history - overblown folk tales that were sensationalized.
Basically, I think the equivalent of the "superhero" stories from 1000 BC turned into legend/myth and somehow got believed. It would be as if in the year 4000 kids reading their history books would learn about Peter Parker, who lived in the late 20th century who could climb walls and helped drive out the evils of the Soviet Union.
Anyway, so I had a little fun comparing biblical stories to modern Marvel comics. I'll include annotations for those who are't familiar.
I guess my point (besides trying to make someone laugh) is to reiterate one of Jeremy Runnell's points during his Mormon Stories interview with John Dehlin. To wit, "Everything is a remix." This was his response to the question of how he thought the Book of Mormon came about - that Joseph Smith just kinda took the Bible, added a few original bits, wrote in some of the sermons he had heard from local preachers, threw in some military strategy from another book he read, pretend to dictate it from reading his i-stone in his hat, and BOOM! You get the Book of Mormon.
Another thing that motivated me to make these images was the movie Hercules starring Dwayne Johnson. In it, there's a group of people who help a strong man do some stuff and the details are greatly (and purposely) exaggerated as they are told and retold. That's pretty much what I think of most Bible stories and the supernatural or miraculous events it presents as history - overblown folk tales that were sensationalized.
Basically, I think the equivalent of the "superhero" stories from 1000 BC turned into legend/myth and somehow got believed. It would be as if in the year 4000 kids reading their history books would learn about Peter Parker, who lived in the late 20th century who could climb walls and helped drive out the evils of the Soviet Union.
Anyway, so I had a little fun comparing biblical stories to modern Marvel comics. I'll include annotations for those who are't familiar.
Abraham was commanded by God to sacrifice his son Isaac by stopped at the last moment. Darth Vader was commanded to either kill his son Luke or make him join their evil plan in Star Wars. |
Methuselah was purported to have lived to almost 1,000 years in the Bible. Yoda lived for over 900 years and trained Jedi for 800 years in Star Wars. |
Coriantumr cut of Shiz's head, after which he was said to raise up on his hands. Count Dooku and Jango Fett were both beheaded by lightsabers in Star Wars, but both just collapsed and didn't get up. |
Ammon stood in front of King Lamoni and was able to figure out his thoughts after a long time. Professor X's mutant powers allow him to read and project thoughts in the X-Men. |
Teancum scaled walls to kill enemy commanders. Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider and gained the ability to climb walls, jump acrobatically, and swing from web he created in Spider-Man. |
Jesus was executed by being nailed to a cross. Thor, the God of Thunder, uses Mjolnir to defeat enemies in Thor. |
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Saturday, February 27, 2016
The Problem with the Missionary Program isn't the Missionaries
I read something the other day that really hit home. It was from the New Order Mormon forum, and reposted on reddit. New Order Mormons, or NOMs, are members of the LDS church who are aware of some of the troubling issues that cause people to leave/question/doubt, but have sufficiently resolved the problem for themselves. They may be staying for family or occupational reasons, and often will pick and choose which parts of the doctrine/church programs to follow. So for example, one NOM might ignore the Word of Wisdom and Tithing but still attend services and accept a calling. Another NOM might adhere to everything said by Joseph Smith and not so much to teachings by later presidents. Sometimes they are called, "Cafeteria Mormons" because they only follow the pieces they like instead of all of it.
Anyway, on the topic of why the missionary program seems like it has been stagnating recently, someone hit the nail on the head. He/She posted the thoughts (presumably) with the intent that hopefully someone who works at the Church Office Building (COB) might see these and recognize that these are valid concerns, while realizing that the chance of this happening to be very small. This is pretty much how I thought and felt while a member but was unable to articulate it so eloquently, and I was too nervous to say them aloud out of fear of being labeled an apostate. Anyway, here it is.
Link to the original post: http://forum.newordermormon.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=46646
Comment made by user: "Lostinmiddlemormonism" about halfway down the page.
I believe I could help the church out considerably with their missionary work endeavors, but I fear they are not really interested in real improvement.
However, for all of our friends in the church office building that are reading this, I shall offer some feedback, without even charging for the consulting provided.
Let us start by talking about what the problems in missionary work are not:
• 1. It is NOT a lack of missionaries out in the "mission field"
• 2. It is NOT a lack of money and resources devoted to the program
• 3. It is NOT that the members are "slacking" or unmotivated
• 4. It is NOT that the missionaries are "unworthy"
• 5. It is NOT that the missionaries need to work harder
• 6. It is NOT that there needs to be a new program
• 7. It is NOT a problem with the approach
• 8. It is NOT a problem of language or communication
• 9. It is NOT that members don't have non-member friends
• 10. Nor is it that the members are scared to talk to their friends about the church.
Here it is in a nutshell - The problem is the product. The problem is that the members wouldn't wish the church on their worst enemies let alone their friends.
Most members - even the active ones - do not leave church on Sunday feeling measurably better than when they went in. They are not "uplifted." They are frustrated, saddened, and upset. Nearly everything is done half-assed.
The EQ President is only doing his calling because he was guilted into it. The Cub Master doesn't want to be in Scouts, but feels obligated because his son is in the program. The RS President is trying to be a funeral organizer, guidance counselor, principal, mother, wife, and welfare consultant all rolled into one and wonders why she isn't "good enough." The YW have a budget that wouldn't run a lemonade stand, and the idea of a fun ward activity is a potluck dinner in a smelly gymnasium that hasn't been cleaned effectively because the members are supposed to do that too, in their spare time.
The Home Teachers and Visiting Teachers (a.k.a. all the adults in the ward) are spending 3 evenings a month chasing down people that don't want to be visited. Not to mention the lies that they are forced to tell themselves in order to fit into this supposed ward family. They can't tell the truth that they find the temple weird, that they support gay marriage, or that they really don't want to spend two years of their life pushing religion on people that are perfectly happy without it for fear of being labeled a social pariah.
The problem is most ethical and moral human beings wouldn't wish the church on anyone. They intrinsically recognize that the church is to religion what McDonald's is to a fine dining experience. It is bland, it is cheap, it is mass produced, and it is barely functional. The average member, even if they don't recognize it consciously, understands the truism that, "What is good in Mormonism is not unique, and what is unique is not very good." When individuals do "share the gospel," what happens? Research your own experience and that of your friends. Someone posts a pro-LDS thought to Twitter, or Facebook. Who likes it? Other members! That's it! No one else, and the majority of those members only "like" it because they feel obligated to do so.
Give the average member the choice of attending the temple or a recently released movie (like Star Wars) and most will pick the latter every time. This is especially true if they aren't trying to demonstrate to the questioner how righteous they are. Why is this? Because, they get more fulfillment out of the movie at the local Cinemark than they do from the movie at the International House of Handshakes. Give members a choice of an early summer boat trip on the first Saturday of April or watching General Conference and what will most pick? Why?
The problem isn't the sales force folks. The problem is that the product does not work as advertised. If the membership of the church was actually getting out of their church experience what they say they are getting out of it, then you wouldn't be able to stop them from dragging their friends in the door, and more importantly, their friends would quickly recognize it. Why does everyone have an iPhone or an Android in their pocket? Because they work. Because they add value to their life. Because there is a real and measurable benefit. Why is the missionary program stagnant? Because it doesn't deliver what it promises.
And so my friends in the COB, until you fix this very fundamental problem, it won't matter what you do with the missionary effort or what cool new program you try. Until you fix that flaw, anything else is doomed to failure, and to make matters worse, putting this repetitively on the members only exacerbates the problem.
The only thing that I disagree with in my own personal case is the Cub Master bit (I loved doing that). But everything else is spot on.
(Posted by Joseph using Anne's account)
Anyway, on the topic of why the missionary program seems like it has been stagnating recently, someone hit the nail on the head. He/She posted the thoughts (presumably) with the intent that hopefully someone who works at the Church Office Building (COB) might see these and recognize that these are valid concerns, while realizing that the chance of this happening to be very small. This is pretty much how I thought and felt while a member but was unable to articulate it so eloquently, and I was too nervous to say them aloud out of fear of being labeled an apostate. Anyway, here it is.
Link to the original post: http://forum.newordermormon.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=46646
Comment made by user: "Lostinmiddlemormonism" about halfway down the page.
I believe I could help the church out considerably with their missionary work endeavors, but I fear they are not really interested in real improvement.
However, for all of our friends in the church office building that are reading this, I shall offer some feedback, without even charging for the consulting provided.
Let us start by talking about what the problems in missionary work are not:
• 1. It is NOT a lack of missionaries out in the "mission field"
• 2. It is NOT a lack of money and resources devoted to the program
• 3. It is NOT that the members are "slacking" or unmotivated
• 4. It is NOT that the missionaries are "unworthy"
• 5. It is NOT that the missionaries need to work harder
• 6. It is NOT that there needs to be a new program
• 7. It is NOT a problem with the approach
• 8. It is NOT a problem of language or communication
• 9. It is NOT that members don't have non-member friends
• 10. Nor is it that the members are scared to talk to their friends about the church.
Here it is in a nutshell - The problem is the product. The problem is that the members wouldn't wish the church on their worst enemies let alone their friends.
Most members - even the active ones - do not leave church on Sunday feeling measurably better than when they went in. They are not "uplifted." They are frustrated, saddened, and upset. Nearly everything is done half-assed.
The EQ President is only doing his calling because he was guilted into it. The Cub Master doesn't want to be in Scouts, but feels obligated because his son is in the program. The RS President is trying to be a funeral organizer, guidance counselor, principal, mother, wife, and welfare consultant all rolled into one and wonders why she isn't "good enough." The YW have a budget that wouldn't run a lemonade stand, and the idea of a fun ward activity is a potluck dinner in a smelly gymnasium that hasn't been cleaned effectively because the members are supposed to do that too, in their spare time.
The Home Teachers and Visiting Teachers (a.k.a. all the adults in the ward) are spending 3 evenings a month chasing down people that don't want to be visited. Not to mention the lies that they are forced to tell themselves in order to fit into this supposed ward family. They can't tell the truth that they find the temple weird, that they support gay marriage, or that they really don't want to spend two years of their life pushing religion on people that are perfectly happy without it for fear of being labeled a social pariah.
The problem is most ethical and moral human beings wouldn't wish the church on anyone. They intrinsically recognize that the church is to religion what McDonald's is to a fine dining experience. It is bland, it is cheap, it is mass produced, and it is barely functional. The average member, even if they don't recognize it consciously, understands the truism that, "What is good in Mormonism is not unique, and what is unique is not very good." When individuals do "share the gospel," what happens? Research your own experience and that of your friends. Someone posts a pro-LDS thought to Twitter, or Facebook. Who likes it? Other members! That's it! No one else, and the majority of those members only "like" it because they feel obligated to do so.
Give the average member the choice of attending the temple or a recently released movie (like Star Wars) and most will pick the latter every time. This is especially true if they aren't trying to demonstrate to the questioner how righteous they are. Why is this? Because, they get more fulfillment out of the movie at the local Cinemark than they do from the movie at the International House of Handshakes. Give members a choice of an early summer boat trip on the first Saturday of April or watching General Conference and what will most pick? Why?
The problem isn't the sales force folks. The problem is that the product does not work as advertised. If the membership of the church was actually getting out of their church experience what they say they are getting out of it, then you wouldn't be able to stop them from dragging their friends in the door, and more importantly, their friends would quickly recognize it. Why does everyone have an iPhone or an Android in their pocket? Because they work. Because they add value to their life. Because there is a real and measurable benefit. Why is the missionary program stagnant? Because it doesn't deliver what it promises.
And so my friends in the COB, until you fix this very fundamental problem, it won't matter what you do with the missionary effort or what cool new program you try. Until you fix that flaw, anything else is doomed to failure, and to make matters worse, putting this repetitively on the members only exacerbates the problem.
The only thing that I disagree with in my own personal case is the Cub Master bit (I loved doing that). But everything else is spot on.
(Posted by Joseph using Anne's account)
Friday, December 11, 2015
This week's thoughts . . .
One of the things that has been most interesting to me is how people react to the news of us leaving the church, but more specifically, how people who were never members react.
Growing up, I was often told that my non-member friends, acquaintances, teachers, and co-workers would all know of my religious standards, and would be watching me carefully. I kinda always pictured it as a cross between Roz from Monsters, Inc. and James Tolkan's character from Top Gun.
"I'm watching you, Wazowski. Always watching. And if you screw up just this much, you'll be flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog [crap] out of Hong Kong!"
In fact, most of the world was this way, because the church was known so well worldwide with all of its charitable works and humanitarian aid efforts. I got the impression that everyone recognized that what I (and other church members) was doing was the best/correct way of living, but these other people weren't strong enough to do the same.This was presented as an example of the "crab mentality," in the sense that everyone else (the "world") was waiting to pull me down if I stooped to their level, so I had to constantly stay above them and out of their reach. I was, of course, encouraged to try to convert them to bring them up to my standards.
For what it's worth, I fully recognize that this was my own interpretation of what I was told/taught at home and church and not official doctrine, but many other ex-Mormons have expressed similar sentiments, so I'm not alone.
The other thing I was always taught was that the temple was this place where things so spectacular and holy took place that we weren't able to speak of them outside of its walls. Non-members were just dying to get in there and find out what happens in there and learn the secrets. People often tried to sneak in to the temple, but the older gentlemen who guarded the doors kept them out through the spirit of discernment. And besides the temple stuff, there were plenty of other things that people wanted to know about the church but they were too afraid to ask.
I figured that once we announced we had left the church, non-member friends would be banging down our doors to find out the big secrets they had so longed to know. Additionally, this was such a life-changing event that they must be curious to know every juicy detail.
As it turns out, most people are generally uninterested. After I had removed the Mormon rose colored glasses, I learned that many people have a hard time distinguishing Mormons from Jehovah's Witnesses and even the Amish (including inside the US - especially in the eastern parts). Most people might equate an event like resigning from the church to something like switching gym memberships, while in our mind it's more like coming out of the closet and announcing one's self to be gay.
And they don't really care about the temple - they just think it to be weird and laughably cultish. People are not obsessed with seeing if their Mormon friends drink caffeinated Coke, or drop the F-bomb. They don't think twice about what goes on in the temple any more than you probably think about Shaolin monks learning Kung Fu.
Growing up, I was often told that my non-member friends, acquaintances, teachers, and co-workers would all know of my religious standards, and would be watching me carefully. I kinda always pictured it as a cross between Roz from Monsters, Inc. and James Tolkan's character from Top Gun.
"I'm watching you, Wazowski. Always watching. And if you screw up just this much, you'll be flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog [crap] out of Hong Kong!"
In fact, most of the world was this way, because the church was known so well worldwide with all of its charitable works and humanitarian aid efforts. I got the impression that everyone recognized that what I (and other church members) was doing was the best/correct way of living, but these other people weren't strong enough to do the same.This was presented as an example of the "crab mentality," in the sense that everyone else (the "world") was waiting to pull me down if I stooped to their level, so I had to constantly stay above them and out of their reach. I was, of course, encouraged to try to convert them to bring them up to my standards.
For what it's worth, I fully recognize that this was my own interpretation of what I was told/taught at home and church and not official doctrine, but many other ex-Mormons have expressed similar sentiments, so I'm not alone.
The other thing I was always taught was that the temple was this place where things so spectacular and holy took place that we weren't able to speak of them outside of its walls. Non-members were just dying to get in there and find out what happens in there and learn the secrets. People often tried to sneak in to the temple, but the older gentlemen who guarded the doors kept them out through the spirit of discernment. And besides the temple stuff, there were plenty of other things that people wanted to know about the church but they were too afraid to ask.
I figured that once we announced we had left the church, non-member friends would be banging down our doors to find out the big secrets they had so longed to know. Additionally, this was such a life-changing event that they must be curious to know every juicy detail.
As it turns out, most people are generally uninterested. After I had removed the Mormon rose colored glasses, I learned that many people have a hard time distinguishing Mormons from Jehovah's Witnesses and even the Amish (including inside the US - especially in the eastern parts). Most people might equate an event like resigning from the church to something like switching gym memberships, while in our mind it's more like coming out of the closet and announcing one's self to be gay.
And they don't really care about the temple - they just think it to be weird and laughably cultish. People are not obsessed with seeing if their Mormon friends drink caffeinated Coke, or drop the F-bomb. They don't think twice about what goes on in the temple any more than you probably think about Shaolin monks learning Kung Fu.
I guess it's one of the hallmarks of an organization like this to make its members self-important and artificially inflate its influence. It's one of those things that makes me seriously face-palm when I think about it. But I'm just glad I'm out and can now see what everyone else can see without the blindfold of mind-control.
Friday, October 30, 2015
Expecting Too Much
I recently had an experience where I was talking with someone about my reasons for leaving the church. The first thing that was asked about was if someone had offended me or something like that. I told him no, I wouldn’t let something petty like that get in the way of my eternal salvation, and proceeded to explain a few of my (legitimate) reasons. After I listed a few things and how I felt about them, he told me that I must not have been a very strong member to let those things bother me, and that I expected too much of the leaders of the church (read: held them to too high of a standard). But then he didn’t want to go any further into the conversation. Since I didn’t really get to respond to him, I’ll do so on this blog just to get my thoughts off my chest, even if it’s never read by him.This is the response to the “expected too much” jab. The other half was a previous post.
I am told that I became disillusioned when I learned that prophets were not perfect. I never expected perfection. On the contrary, believing that prophets were weak and mortal but called to a great work anyway was inspiring. It’s not their private behavior that is troubling (that’s what repentance was supposedly for). It’s their prophetic work, official statements, policies, published writing, and public teachings that are the problem. It's the fact that they don't really do what they say they're supposed to do. It's really summed up in a General Conference meme I saw last year made by a faithful member. It showed a wide shot of the Conference Center and the caption read, "Come see a Prophet, Seer, and Revelator." But the kicker was what someone else added to it. At the bottom was another caption that read, "literally do none of those things."
Maybe it's because I was taught from birth how cool it was that we had an actual prophet - someone who talks with Jesus and God regularly passing on the info we need. I mean, we read about cool prophets and apostles in the scriptures, like Moses, Elijah, Peter, Paul, Nephi, and Alma. And then we're told in countless lessons that in SLC, less than a 6 hour drive away from where I was raised, was today's equivalent. Other talks had stories of non-members observing that if we didn't know what the prophet had to say this month, then we must not really consider him a prophet worth following (the underlying message was: "Renew your Ensign subscription"). But I don't expect perfect prophet. But here what I do expect:
I am told that I became disillusioned when I learned that prophets were not perfect. I never expected perfection. On the contrary, believing that prophets were weak and mortal but called to a great work anyway was inspiring. It’s not their private behavior that is troubling (that’s what repentance was supposedly for). It’s their prophetic work, official statements, policies, published writing, and public teachings that are the problem. It's the fact that they don't really do what they say they're supposed to do. It's really summed up in a General Conference meme I saw last year made by a faithful member. It showed a wide shot of the Conference Center and the caption read, "Come see a Prophet, Seer, and Revelator." But the kicker was what someone else added to it. At the bottom was another caption that read, "literally do none of those things."
Maybe it's because I was taught from birth how cool it was that we had an actual prophet - someone who talks with Jesus and God regularly passing on the info we need. I mean, we read about cool prophets and apostles in the scriptures, like Moses, Elijah, Peter, Paul, Nephi, and Alma. And then we're told in countless lessons that in SLC, less than a 6 hour drive away from where I was raised, was today's equivalent. Other talks had stories of non-members observing that if we didn't know what the prophet had to say this month, then we must not really consider him a prophet worth following (the underlying message was: "Renew your Ensign subscription"). But I don't expect perfect prophet. But here what I do expect:
- I do expect prophets to avoid a century of making racist statements, official policies, and doctrine.
- I do expect prophets to not marry young girls or other men’s wives.
- I do expect prophets to not lie about polygamy.
- I do expect a prophet to be ahead of his time (not behind it) in racial, gender, sexual issues. Either get ahead of the issues or stick to your position because aligning with social norms a decade or two late, just looks very…non-prophetic.
- I do expect a prophet to not go on national television and say that we don’t teach things that are at the very heart of our doctrine.
- I do expect a prophet to know when they are being conned (Kinderhook Plates, the Mark Hofmann forgeries, etc) since we teach how BoM prophets are able to confound opponents and know their thoughts like Ammon did.
- I do expect a prophet to give a full accounting of the billions and billions in revenues and expenditures to his followers
I do expect a prophet to perform miracles. Why were the two Christian doctors with ebola flown straight to Atlanta and not Salt Lake?I know, I know, I'm being unreasonable here. That would be to close to expecting a perfect prophet. Retracted.
- I do expect a prophet to prophesy.
- I do expect a prophet to not lie when asked a direct question, and then hem and haw about it when he realizes that he has been caught.
- I expect a prophet to discern between speaking as a man and speaking for God. If he can't tell, what good is he? It's like a compass that works 50% of the time. You're not blessed for following it.
- I do expect a prophet to see and talk with God and Jesus and not change who was or wasn't there each time the story is told.
- If I sustain a prophet, seer and revelator, I expect more than just day-to-day administration of a corporation.
- If I sustain an individual as President or representative of an organization, I expect them to speak for that organization - NOT hide behind a PR Newsroom.
In short, I expect a prophet to be like the ones in the scriptures, if they really are prophets. Of course, what I think now is that the deeds of past prophets are probably more akin to the feats of Hercules in the recent movie starring Dwayne Johnson - basically exaggerated oral tales.
But now we are told to, "Give Brother Joseph" a break (something I'm sure they intend to for us to extend to any one of the 'brothern' that make up the top 15, past and present). Like I said, I'm fine with people not being perfect. But if it's okay in God's eyes for a prophet to screw something up now and again and accidentally have incorrect doctrine/policies, why did he abandon the Catholic church if he's fine with all of these things? Why did they need a restoration? If, despite a clear line back to the early Christian church, proper authority through laying on of hands needed to be restored, why not just have Peter, James, and John give it to the Pope and instantly have a billion people in his true church? I don't feel the need to answer these questions myself as an agnostic, but I doubt any Mormon apologist has a good answer for this.
And I am always dumbfounded by the defense True Believing Mormons make of apostles that they are just "products of their time," or they, "grew up in a different culture," while the "prophets" are constantly telling us to not be influenced by the trends of our day. But it's somehow ok that they are apparently steeped in the trends of THEIR day. I thought the whole reason why we needed a prophet was to rise above popular sentiment and show us truth. How come none of them realized that American racism was a bad thing? How about a teaching or two about the advancement of women (not the advice to wear lipstick)?
To use a sports analogy, it gets tiring putting on a front to the world about how the Chicago Cubs are the perpetually the greatest perennial undefeated World Series team when reality says something far different. Sometimes you gotta call a spade a spade and realize that these are just businessmen running a corporation, not inspired leaders of a church who talk with Jesus. It's funny how obvious it is once you let yourself see it and think about it without all the brainwashing that comes with it, kinda like "the Cheerleader Effect" from How I Met Your Mother (apologies on the helium voices in the clip - it's not mine). Once the illusion is broken, you can't get it back. Kinda like believing in Santa.
Lastly, the church often uses the phrase, "By their fruits ye shall know them," usually referring to knowing if someone is of Christ or of the Devil by seeing what kind of acts they do. I believe that applies in this situation, as well. From what I can see, their fruits are similar to those I would expect of a corporate head, and not the fruits of a prophet (i.e., prophecies, translations, etc.).
Lastly, the church often uses the phrase, "By their fruits ye shall know them," usually referring to knowing if someone is of Christ or of the Devil by seeing what kind of acts they do. I believe that applies in this situation, as well. From what I can see, their fruits are similar to those I would expect of a corporate head, and not the fruits of a prophet (i.e., prophecies, translations, etc.).
Thursday, October 29, 2015
My "Church Pedigree"
I recently had an experience where I was talking with
someone about my reasons for leaving the church. The first thing that was asked
about was if someone had offended me or something like that. I told him no, I
wouldn’t let something petty like that get in the way of my eternal salvation,
and proceeded to explain a few of my (legitimate) reasons.
After I listed a few things and how I felt about them, he
told me that I must not have been a very strong member to let those things
bother me, and that I expected too much of the leaders of the church (read:
held them to too high of a standard). But then he didn’t want to go any further
into the conversation. Since I didn’t really get to respond to him, I’ll do so
on this blog just to get my thoughts off my chest, even if it’s never read by
him.
This is the response to the “wasn’t a very strong member”
jab. The other half will be another post.
One accusation often flung at people who leave the church is
something along the lines that they didn’t really believe, or weren’t really
faithful (often accompanied by the ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy). Or that they
were lazy, or just possibly wanted to sin. It’s really condescending, as there
are many legitimate reasons to leave an organization.
But just to put it out there, here is my “church pedigree,”
presented as a checklist with a longer explanation afterwards.
√ Born in the Covenant
√ Baptized at age 8
√ Ordained to Aaronic Priesthood at age
12
√ Promoted to office of Teacher at age
14
√ Promoted to office of Priest at age 16
√ Received Patriarchal Blessing at age 16
√ Received Eagle Scout Award at age 17
√ Graduated Seminary with near perfect
attendance
√ Ordained to Melchizedek Priesthood at
age 18
√ Attended Ricks College for a year
√ Received Endowment in Boise Temple at
age 18
√ Served a faithful mission in Japan
√ Married in Timpanogos Temple at age 22
√ Paid tithing in full from 9th
grade on, and kept a current
Temple Recommend until about a year before we left the church
Temple Recommend until about a year before we left the church
□ Graduated Institute
□ Always did my Home
Teaching
I was BIC, or ‘born in the covenant,’ meaning that my
parents had been sealed together in the temple before I was born. I come from
pioneer stock on my mom’s side (William Clayton, if you must know), and all my
extended family were members of the church. We had FHE most weeks, and started
reading scriptures almost every night as a family. I was baptized at 8 years
old, and received the Aaronic priesthood at age 12. During my stint as a
deacon, I showed up on time and passed the sacrament without complaint, and
served as the quorum’s secretary.
I think it was also during this time that one Sunday we had
a substitute Deacons Quorum teacher (J Sher) who had forgotten he had agreed to
teach. He told us all to pile into his car and he drove us to Albertson’s. When
he pulled into the parking lot, he instructed us to stay in the car. About 5
minutes later he came out with some kind of ice cream bars and passed them out
to us. My cousin Jason happened to be visiting that day, and he thought it was
great, and asked if this was what we did every week. I refused to eat the ice
cream, as I knew it had been purchased on the Sabbath day.
At age 14, I moved into the Teacher’s quorum, where I was
usually the first boy to start preparing the sacrament each week (though the
credit for that can be mostly given to my dad, who went to church a little
early to secure his favorite parking spot and bench). But there were many weeks
where I was the only one who had prepared the sacrament except for the last 2
or 3 minutes. I didn’t complain, but wondered what would happen if I didn’t
show up early.
When I started Seminary, I missed a few days during my
freshman year because I had stayed home sick. But I’m pretty sure I only missed
maybe 1 other day during the entire next three years. This was made possible by
the A/B rollover schedule we switched to, and I usually had my math, seminary,
and my other favorite classes on the same day. The result was that I only
missed the other days.
As a priest, I think I blessed the sacrament probably all
but maybe 15 weeks during those 2 years (and those were usually vacation or
sick days). I received my Patriarchal Blessing, and was asked to be the
seminary class president, and then during my senior year to be on the Seminary
Council. I also baptized my younger brother because my dad wasn’t being the
most active member at the time.
I read the Book of Mormon on my own (in addition to
scripture study with my family) and reported to the bishop on my progress. I
also took it upon myself to go online and defend the church in chat rooms, to
better know what I would be against while on my mission.
After graduating Seminary and high school, I went to RicksCollege (in the 2nd to last year it was Ricks), and continued my
streak of church attendance. The only day I missed was the night I got locked
out of my room (long story) and I had to sleep in the laundry room (because it
was the only warm place).
I spent most of my visits home from school in some sort of
mission prep function, like getting my wisdom teeth out, going through the
temple, or attending interviews. By the time I left for the MTC, I had read the
Book of Mormon probably 5 times as a family, and twice on my own. While in the
MTC, I was disheartened at how little most of the other missionaries knew about
basic gospel principles, or even the contents of the Book of Mormon.
I served a mission to Japan, a country not known for its
hoards of converts, while learning a language with a reputation for being
difficult. After 9 months in the field I became a trainer, and a few months
later a District Leader. I moved up to Zone Leader for 4 months before going
home. I followed the mission rules strictly, and other than the days I had a
sick companion, we were out doing some kind of missionary work every day
(except for the one time my companion and I saw Star Wars. C’mon, it’s Star
Wars). The one time I broke the Word of Wisdom also happened there, when I accidentally got half a mouthful of green tea by mistake. Other than that, the only WoW infractions I incurred were eating fruit out of season or eating meat when there was no famine (nor did I use tobacco to heal bruised cattle).
When I got home, I moved to Utah and was married in the
temple within the year. After around 2 and a half years of living in the new
ward, I was asked to be the Elders Quorum President. I declined, as we had a
newborn and I was working fulltime and attending night school fulltime. I also
had experienced the beginnings of my faith crisis, and felt that the ward
deserved someone who fully believed. The ward had a major division between
those established in homes and those in apartments. The apartment dwellers were
usually snubbed when it came to callings of any significance, so it was kind of
a big deal to me. I accepted the calling of Sunday School President until we moved.
After being in our new ward about a year, I was asked to be the 1st
Counselor in the EQP. I accepted because the President was my friend who had
also served a mission in Japan, and whom I had a lot in common. I did that for
3 years before being asked to move up to President again, which I again
declined.
And one more thing to add - I knew the Book of Mormon so
well that Anne and I used to play this game where she would pick a random verse
and start reading, then I would tell her book and chapter (I only got stumped
twice).
About the only 2 dings on my record are that my home
teaching dedication wasn’t always the best, and I didn’t go to institute
(unless you count the year at Ricks).
It wasn’t until 6 years in “Scouter Darkness” that we
ended up leaving the church, during which I paid tithing in full and did
everything else I needed to do to keep a current Temple Recommend.
And during that time was when I was working through my faith crisis, desperately trying to find ways to do mental gymnastics to make things work and find ways to keep believing despite my nagging doubts that kept refusing to stay tucked away on “the shelf” of issues in my mind.
And during that time was when I was working through my faith crisis, desperately trying to find ways to do mental gymnastics to make things work and find ways to keep believing despite my nagging doubts that kept refusing to stay tucked away on “the shelf” of issues in my mind.
So, if I may be so bold, don’t you DARE accuse me of
being a lukewarm member! I did EVERYTHING I was supposed to. It wasn't because I was a weak-willed member who was, "seduced by the Dark Side of the Force," after reading "anti-Mormon" lies. It was learning about all the true facts about church history that were hidden from me, and confirming them from church-approved websites that did it. The fact that they came out and admitted to a lot of these things only confirms my decision.
Edit/Update: I don't want it to sound like I think I'm perfect. I was far from it, making my share of mistakes including not always treating my brothers nicely (like the usual brotherly teasing). But on the things that might be considered on "the checklist," I took care of it.
Edit/Update: I don't want it to sound like I think I'm perfect. I was far from it, making my share of mistakes including not always treating my brothers nicely (like the usual brotherly teasing). But on the things that might be considered on "the checklist," I took care of it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)